|
The marines are always on the look out for a few good men.
The Society chooses loftier goals – we are on the look out for a few
good wines. In our youth this was a
relatively simple task, Riesling came from Leo Burings, Semillon came from
Tyrrells or Lindemans, reds came from Penfolds, Wynns, Tyrrells, Lindemans or
Rouge Homme. Nowadays there are
thousands of makers with each one pursuing excellence across a range of styles
that was unheard of 20 years ago. Stepping
into a bottle shop is to be assaulted by a phalanx of colourful labels vying for
attention. Of course we are assisted
in our buying choices by a plethora of advice from merchants, columnists and
professional wine writers, but nothing really substitutes for hands on
experience. With this in mind, the Wine Sub Committee has called upon a diverse group of Society members to form a panel to meet monthly. The challenge is for panel members, within a theme, to find wines of quality that the Society might otherwise overlook. In other words, not the Penfolds, Lindemans and Tyrrells wines that we regularly purchase (and love). The panel consists fairly equally of members whose main interest is food, and members whose expertise is in wine. This is a deliberate choice in recognition that the chefs, who serve the Society so well, do recognise a good food wine when they see it. The Society is blessed in that it does have a large pool of people who can contribute on wine matters. More importantly, the Society is composed of people who are knowledgeable about combining wine with food. Many media wine experts only review wines in clinical conditions where food plays little or no role. The panel “works” under more realistic conditions with a manageable number of wines looked at over a lunch. Unfortunately this constrains the size of the tasting group to around a maximum of 10 people. However, as we are all busy people this tends to work out as 8 familiar faces and a couple of conscripts. In this fashion we hope to involve more members in the selection process. If the reader should happen to be tapped on the shoulder, please bear in mind that the panel is not funded by Society resources. Each panel member pays his own way for both wine and food consumed at these tastings. The 10 panel members may look at a dozen wines over lunch (some members are two bottle men). The wines, which are brought masked by panel members, are served randomly in brackets of three by the staff of the Royal Exchange of Sydney Club (whose food I can heartily recommend). This ensures that no one is tempted to taste a wines provenance rather than its quality. Panel members individually rank the wines in each bracket (ie 1, 2, 3) and scores are collated. A buying recommendation (ie yes, no) is also sought. The Panel has met on three occasions. Members may be interested in their findings. Riesling Tasting Overall, a fairly consistent group of good quality.
As this was the first outing for the panel there were one or two teething
problems. Two wines were out of
theme, the Pipers Brook (because it was not a current release) and the Wolf Blass Gold Label 00 Forward style, short palate. Jenke 99 Hard wine not particularly attractive. Pipers Brook 98 Excellent wine showing a little bottle development. McWilliams Eden Valley 97 Intense wine, complex, long clean acid finish. Tapestry 99 Ordinary. Leconfield 98 Typical Coonawarra Riesling, more acid than fruit. Skillogalee 00 Disappointing for Clare. Tim Adams 00 Nice lean style, needs time. Tamar Ridge 99 Alsatian style good for asian food. Martindale Hall 98 Dull and unattractive. Tollana Eden Valley 00 Good balance of fruit and steely acid. Could cellar. Via
Verde ( De Bortoli 99 A pretty wine but lacks weight. Dromana 99 Classy pinot. Sappy nose, clean mid weight fruit,and fine tannins. Yarra Burn 99 Burnt coffee aromas, hard wine. Lake George 99 Interesting wine, good pinot character. Green Point 98 Fairly simple wine, short finish. Shadowfax 00 Youthful sweet fruit, sharp acid finish. Pibbin 98 Mid-weight fruit but not particularly Pinot. Sorrenberg 00 Foxy fruit, good depth. Different. Delmare
( Tarrawarra 99 Great Pinot of depth and class. Needs time. Yalumba Clare 98 Spicy, good acid and fruit driven. Tollana TR222 98 Robust but let down by a slightly dirty finish. Leconfield Cabernet (sic) 98 Peppery, not obviously straight cabernet. Acidic. Rosemount Res. Coonawarra 98 Good intensity, brilliant colour, long-term wine. Petaluma 98 A let down. Stalky and tannic. Amery Mclaren Vale 98 Dense, intense, blockbuster fruit. Very attractive. McWilliams Coonawarra 98 Lacks sweet fruit. One dimensional. Barwang 99 Classy. Superb balance and structure. A keeper. Jacobs Creek Reserve 98 Dark colour, lacks complexity. Balgownie 98 Simple. Mount Arrarat 99 A little dumb, slightly dirty finish. Brands Coonawarra 98 Flavoursome. Chewy American oak. Good weight. Petaluma 98 Short. Brokenwood Rayners 99 Round big McLaren Vale fruit. Polished. Ingoldby 99 Intense clean varietal. Long, and great depth. Tamar (McLaren Vale) 98 A little musty. Picarus (Limestone Coast) 98 Balanced, some depth. E & C 99 Corked. Hill of Gold 99 Juicy, solid tannins. Peschars Ryan Ridge 99 Minty American oak nose. A little raw. Needs time. Wirra Wirra RSW 98 Big rich mellow wine. Haselgrove 98 Rich fruit wine with good oak. Nice length Tyrrells Vat 9 96 Obvious Hunter. Nice weight. St Hallet’s Old Block 98 Stunning. Rufus Stone Heathcote 99 Well made intense wine. Tatachilla Foundation 98 Big fruit driven wine. Excellent. Liebich Weir “The Darkie” 99 Very raw and aggressive. Hamilton “Gumpers Block” 98 Over the top oak. Jamieson’s Run “McShanes” 98 Corked. Mt Langi Ghiran 98 Dense brooding fruit and tannin. Charles Cimicky Reserve 98 Rich fruit but a tad volatile. Huntington FB 16 Cabernet 98 Persistent fruit, possibly a little over oaked. Montana Reserve Pinot 00 Well defined Pinot character. Nice sappiness. Plantagenet Shiraz 99 Class wine. Very generous fruit. Long. Vasse Felix Cabernet 97 May need time but has some worrying sharp edges. Hewitson
Mourvedre 99
A Seppelts GW Shiraz 96 A big black bugger. Superb.
Wynns Michael 90 Luscious mouth coating fruit. Great depth and excellent oak handling. Intense finish. Near perfect. The
Plantagenet and Seppelts Great Western were both superb wines worthy of
consideration. The Montana Pinot is
very good value for money. The
Michael Hermitage was out of theme and the panel member who brought it along to
the tasting has been expelled from the group.
Not. The generous provider of
this eponymous wine is too modest to seek renown.
Nevertheless, he Dunne good. PS
We have been buying Maglieri for some time now.
It is clearly a wine that repays cellaring but can also be enjoyed young. French
As
the Australian summer hits, and the temperature begins to soar, a young man’s
fancy turns to bubbly.
Lanson
NV
Fine bead, excellent flavour yet retains a zesty finish. Louis Roederer NV Bready yeast autolysis. Fine palate. Pol NV Complex mushroomy nose. Very intense flavour. Veuve A. Devauax NV Corked.
Billecart Salmon NV Profuse bubbles. Vigorous flavour. Very satisfying.
Bollinger NV Complex developed nose. Good food champagne.
Mum NV Complex white burgundy nose. Creamy. Quite good.
Charles Heidsick 96 A step up in intensity. Very fine bead. Great mousse.
Henri Abele NV Powerful wine. Very fine.
Veuve Cliquot 95 Fine. Bead, enormous depth of flavour. Very long.
Cattier 96 Austere intensity. Lifted end palate.
Moet NV Pungent complex nose. Quite fine. |
|
|